Land for sport in perpetuity
SIR – Re: Bideford Regeneration: Consie Prust, Pam Paddon and others are quite right with their comments relating to Bideford Sports Ground. I served on Bideford Borough Council for several years prior to re-organisation and I clearly remember the questio
SIR - Re: Bideford Regeneration: Consie Prust, Pam Paddon and others are quite right with their comments relating to Bideford Sports Ground.
I served on Bideford Borough Council for several years prior to re-organisation and I clearly remember the question of the use of Bideford Sports Ground being raised at meetings of the council.
At that time one of the members of the council was Alderman Jack Fulford who had been directly involved years before in the acquisition of the land and he stated quite specifically that it had been acquired for sporting purposes for the people of Bideford in perpetuity and that the council held it in trust for that purpose.
This statement was confirmed as being correct by the then town clerk, Mr Leslie B Galliford who was legally qualified.
You may also want to watch:
With regard to the regeneration generally, exactly how is looking at a few sites on which building has not taken place, and then building houses, going to regenerate the town centre?
Using up scarce land for housing leads to the question of how many of those houses will be affordable for local young persons?
- 1 Volunteers come together to spruce up Barnstaple Train Station
- 2 New council led leisure company Active Torridge appoints director
- 3 New home grown manager for South Molton Swimming Pool
- 4 Appeal launched to raise £100,000 for new play equipment in Bideford
- 5 7 top tips to help you find the perfect wedding venue
- 6 More than 530 nights in a tent - Max Woosey wins Young Hero Award
- 7 Murder investigation launched in Bideford after woman found dead
- 8 Selaine Saxby's Henry to compete for Westminster Dog of the Year
- 9 Christine Stephenson found safe and well
- 10 Equestrian star celebrates with sporting royalty
I?see mention of a need for a hotel - can one then assume that the Royal, Tantons and all the other hotels in the vicinity are overflowing?
Whilst on the subject I wonder just how many thousands of pounds, quite apart from the delay, has it cost to conclude that a site halfway up Bridge Street is least likely to flood, while the old Hansen football - which lies below present high water levels - is much more likely to flood!
Any Bidefordian could have given that information in five minutes flat and probably for nothing.
M B Goss,