Email clarification

Why has the Gazette started adding the pointless appellation “via email” to letters?

I’ve recently had to ask a magazine the same question, so wonder if there has been a new legal requirement to do so.

To me it’s ludicrous. Surely it doesn’t matter how the “letter” gets to you. Why don’t you add “by post” or “delivered in person”?

“By carrier pigeon” or “His butler brought it” would stir up a debate on social networking sites.

So, stop it. Please.


You may also want to watch:


Tony Olsson

(via a computerised email network using BT Broadband, but not the new superfast version)

Most Read

EDITOR’S NOTE: As indicated above, all letters – however submitted – should carry the writer’s name, address and, if possible, a daytime telephone number. On occasion, when a letter arrives by email without a postal address, it has not always proved possible to obtain these details and “via email” has been used instead.

That being said, Mr Olsson’s point is well taken. It was certainly pointless of us to add “via email” below a letter writer’s town of origin, as happened on at least a couple of occasions in recent weeks.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter